Captain Digital Speaks! - Latest Comments

Re: Car-mageddon Update.

DeboraB — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:18:45 -0000

The author of the article has a nice and touching point of view. Of course that it's always about the Laws and money. Such cars as that from the picture are nothing impossible to be realized or created. And of course a cheap car insurance would always be in the car's favor and nothing above the law. Besides you have the possibility to save some money as well and to keep the car as new as possible for a long period.

Re: Georgia On My Mind.

swingtrading2 — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:31:15 -0000

Interesting post. I have made a twitter post about this. Others no doubt will like it like I did.

Re: Be Careful What You Wish For.

swingtrading2 — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:54:41 -0000

Interesting post. I have made a twitter post about this. Hope others find it as interesting as I did.

Re: I’m still here. Um…there.

taniascarafile — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:38:19 -0000

Kudos to you for helping your dad. It's important for us to take care of our families and it's nice to see someone putting their loved ones before themselves.

Re: About

paul1827 — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:14:06 -0000

Nice site, Brad. I see you have acquired an impressive self-deprecating sense of humor, which I find a big plus. Gotta go now and pay my 'wife taxes'...take care.
Paul Evans

Re: The King of Pop Dies.

atrumichaeljacksonfan — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:16:42 -0000

i didnt mean 2sound hard sure evry1 gots flaws but he was a seriousy gr8 man u were the 178th peson dat day woo sed something somehing pityful?

no he wasnt he was the gr8 man evr. if u cld understand then i'll have a conversation, until then my sypathies.

Re: Cats & Dogs & Men & Women.

DavidGaffaney — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:30:31 -0000

In other words, attraction to members of the opposite sex is grounded in a subconscious blind date uncensored assessment that they are good breeding stock!

Re: The King of Pop Dies.

captaindigital — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:56:43 -0000

Wow. I mean...WOW. Did you even READ my post? Put the Kool-Aid down for a sec and go re-read it. I didn't condemn him. I acknowledged his talent. I also noted that he led a sad life. And died young, largely because he didn't have limits - on himself, or coming from those that were supposed to care from him. But whack-jobs like you bear some guilt, too. If you can't look at those you admire and see not just the good, but the flaws, then you've moved from admiration to a card-carrying member of a hero-worshiping cult.

Call me when the shuttle lands.

Re: About

captaindigital — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:49:00 -0000

Um...WHAT?! Who are you and why in the hell are you flaming me? I am NOT a spammer. I have had several of the sites I host hacked. But thanks so much for your language, as well as for hiding behind a profane alias and jumping to conclusions. What are you...thirteen?

Re: About

cockheaddigitalsucks — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:45:11 -0000

http://www.captaindigital.net/18572/mxr-phase-9...

Why must you be a filthy search engine spammer, cockhead digital? I find you and kick your ass, you fag

Re: The King of Pop Dies.

atrumichaeljacksonfan — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 05:12:22 -0000

well done u r the sort o fperson this world needs.

Re: The King of Pop Dies.

atrumichaeljacksonfan — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 05:11:02 -0000

PLZ can u shut up and cancel that garbage, he was the gr8test man to ever set foot on this planet and yr lucky you even heard his name in yr lifetime. he had 2 nose surgery and virtiligo (look it up) he was the best , he was the race of mankind. i mean everyone out there is human and that but think all he went thru and did u not hear Paris's speech dat nite???????????? i still find it hard 2 cope then theres fools like u talkin about him like that lokk u dont no him dnt talk about him like dat dont talk about the gr8test man like dat he was the gr8test and 4 ever will b KMJJ. xxx R.I.P. XXX

Re: Jeep-ers, Creepers!

JamesWadeBryant — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:26:18 -0000

I am glad you have a jeep wrangler. I am also a fan of this vehicle primarily because jeep wrangler parts are durable and can withstand the off road..

Re: Who gets Jeep?

john191 — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:54:36 -0000

Loved to read your blog. I would like to suggest you that traffic show most people read blogs on Mondays. So it should encourage bloggers to write new write ups over the weekend primarily.
regards
sears parts

Re: Who gets Jeep?

CristianStar — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:42:38 -0000

I saw some sketeches for the new 2010 Jeep Wrangler and I wouldn't like that to be forgotten somewhere on the drawing board. It should become a reality because many people expect that product on the market. Loyal customers shouldn'e be lost but business is business and this economical crisis is starting to make very nervous.

Re: Michael Jackson and web traffic.

contessa188 — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:45:14 -0000

I think that you must of misunderstood what I was saying because your reply is something I agree with. My statement about him being his "own" person stems from the idea that he should take responsibility for himself and that since so many people want to blame the public I think they should give him more credit for his life- both the good and the bad! I don't think you can say how amazing he is without pointing out his downfalls, without one you could not have the other. More personally I was making no reference to his personal life more so about his role as a performer, entertainer and a charitable figure.

Re: Who gets Jeep?

pachizeron — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:17:21 -0000

Its really sad to hear that Chrysler is going down. The chrysler auto parts and the other brands such as Jeep and Dodge are also going down. Its a really sad reality.

Re: Michael Jackson and web traffic.

antoinetteK — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:48:39 -0000

Michael Jackson was not a paedophile and anyone who followed his case closely, fan or no fan, even the experts came to that conclusion. You may think his behaviour was bizaar or weird but that does not make him a child molestor. The first child refused to testify against Michael and didn't even make the claims himself at first it was his 'wannabe' producer father. If it was your son who was molested you would not accept any amount of money but would want the accuser to go to jail. There were many circumstances surrounding the decision to pay the money, Michael wanted to fight it but he was ill advised by his then wife, lawyers and insurance company. He learned that lesson and was not about to let that happen to him again the second time when he did decide to fight it in court. There was not one shred of evidence found by a very determined police prosecutor and had they found any evidence, they would not have required permission from anyone to charge Michael. That is an offence that would have to be punished regardless. So get your facts right before you pass judgement. This is exactly why Michael was pushed to the edge in the first place.

Re: Michael Jackson and web traffic.

antoinetteK — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:36:42 -0000

Many of us fans do point the finger at ourselves but I for one am sorry that I did abandone Michael Jackson during those years he needed to be believed. I was not fanatical and did not follow the story of his life until now. The reason I am so fascinated by him is because I had not realised that he was actually innocent of those child molestation charges until now. I had not really looked into it or read anything or even watched anything. I only heard about it on the news or in passing the newspaper stands etc. I didn't even believe it at first but I began to wonder why these things were happening to him, not realising the actual facts of the events. When he did it effected me in a way that really surprised me. I did not know that I cared so much. That is when I began to dig up articles and read the transcripts of the court cases and watch the interviews and that is when I realised he was innocent and was a victim of tabloid vilification. I felt deeply sad for him. The only tragic thing about his life was that that was all the media wanted us to see. There was a lot of good things in his life too and I believe he was a strong willed individual who naievely trusted too many people he should have not trusted. He should have listened to those who really loved him but how was he to really know the difference. Look at his life - he never was given a proper chance to grow up. Anyway, all of that is too late now but the saga continues. People continue to lie and people still see dollar signs connected to the name of Michael Jackson and always will. I know he is finally at rest and hope that his children will not face the same problems he had to face. RIP Michael.

Re: [BLEEP] This.

mikeyancey — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:35:50 -0000

Jim: .. Look at my hand... (holds up a steady hand)
Bart: ...Steady as a Rock...
Jim... Yeah, but I shoot with this hand (holds up shaky hand).
----
And, when thinking of Congress, how can you forget this line:
Gov. LePetomaine: "Gentlemen! We gotta to protect our Phoney-Baloney jobs!"

Just remember: that movie CAN NOT be made today.

Mike Y
(And with regards to the Marx Brothers: .... "And one Duck Egg").

Re: Michael Jackson and web traffic.

captaindigital — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:40:02 -0000

Well put. At some point each of us must take responsibility for our actions and our lives. Think about the many talented people that self-destructed - Elvis, Belushi, Morrison, Joplin, Cobain, et all. I believe that most of them (if not all) never had anybody willing to tell them "No." Certainly Elvis surrounded himself with a bunch of people all too willing to let him get away with any behavior (including drug use) no matter how self-destructive. Yet, Elvis had nobody to blame but himself, in the end. My point is that everybody is a product of their upbringing - some are able to overcome childhood problems/abuse/neglect, others not so much.

Oh, and your point about love and parenting were right on target, as well. Thanks for your comments!

Re: Michael Jackson and web traffic.

lilypad — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:08:12 -0000

Many, many , many people come from disfunctional families and don't become what MJ became or come to such a tragic end. He has 8 siblings coming from that same family who did not reach that end -- and Marlon was only year older than Michael, and Randy was YOUNGER than Michael. He had resources to get help that most people don't have, but decided that he was entitled to do whatever he wanted -- consequences be damned. I feel sorry for him. I feel sorry for his children who very likely have spent their entire lives with a barely funtioning parent (their only parent) who was spaced out on drugs almost all the time. Yes, he may have "loved" them, but love is not a feeling, it is an action. And Michael Jackson did nothing to help his children have a functioning parent. That makes him a bad father. So enough about Joe Jackson being the bad father. He got his kids out of poverty and gave them their futures, fortune and fame. Michael needed to get clean for his kids and even though friends and family tried to get him to do it, he simply refused to even discuss it.

Re: Michael Jackson and web traffic.

captaindigital — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:55:51 -0000

Um...maybe...maybe not. Remember, at least one of those cases ended with Jackson paying off the parties that brought up the charges. If I was accused of something that serious, I don't think I'd EVER agree to a payoff. I'd fight the charges with every cent I had.

By Jackson's own admission, he thought it was "normal" and "okay" to sleep with young kids and teens in his bed. I think that's waaaaaaay over the line of common sense and moral behavior.

Just because one case gets thrown out of court or the charges dismissed does not mean you did nothing wrong. It simply means the court did not meet it's burden of proof. (That's why no defendant is ever found "innocent" - they can be found "not guilty" - a subtle legal point, but an important one, nonetheless.)

I don't know if if Jackson was simply an odd individual who was "persecuted" because of his wealth and fame, or if he was a pedophile. Frankly, I don't really care - as long as no kids are being hurt, it's now a moot point. And I think that any parent - ANY parent - that would entrust their kids to someone, no matter how rich or famous - for overnight stays - should be brought up on child endangerment charges themselves. That whole thing fails my "sniff test" and fails it big time.

To assume Jackson was an innocent man makes me think that his fans are allowing his fame and talent to color their judgement, cutting him slack that nobody else on the planet would get.

Re: Michael Jackson and web traffic.

martinalss — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:14:22 -0000

You wrote 'accusations'- they were 'false accusations.' It is so disturbing that an innocent man was persecuted.

Re: The King of Pop Dies.

copenhagenbaby — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:37:12 -0000

I feel that Michael Jackson was presured by the the paparatsy in so many ways' this would even be hard to ignore even by an emotionally strong being. Also he had such little time to grow up in as he was expected to be an adult these things made him suffer dearly. But when he sang and danced he was a different person he was happy and full of life and he tought us things through the words in his songs like Man in the Mirror, Earth Song and Beat it. BUT WHY COULD'NT THE PAPARATSY LEAVE HIM ALONE HE WAS A GOOD PERSON NO MATTER WHAT ANY ONE ELSE SAYS. and Michael Jackson I LOVE YOU AND ALWAYS WILL you are and will be forever be the king of pop!