<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Captain Digital Speaks! - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-3dd6195e" type="application/json"/><link>http://captaindigital.disqus.com/</link><description>the random musings of a marketing/design curmudgeon.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 07:54:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Michael Jackson and web traffic.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=799#comment-12170316</link><description>I guess the thing is that so many of us truly loved Michael Jackson and not for just his music but for his gentleness innocence and his refusal to be shaped to what the world wanted. But mostly we did not ever expect him to die and I will agree that is weird. We all know we are going to die but why did we not expect Michael to, maybe simply because he would not fit in with anything.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ellie590</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 07:54:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The King of Pop Dies.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=793#comment-11955946</link><description>He was really a big star and now he is not in this world seems like that we have lost a big asset of earth. I love him.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jeetmeet80</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:04:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey, Letterman&amp;#8230;didn&amp;#8217;t you used to be funny?</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=775#comment-10743315</link><description>Letterman is going the same way as George Carlin did...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Initially innovative, creative, and amazingly funny; but now, just a bitter, angry old Leftist.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mikeyancey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:57:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hey, Letterman&amp;#8230;didn&amp;#8217;t you used to be funny?</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=775#comment-10743309</link><description>Letterman is going the same way as George Carlin did...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Initially innovative, creative, and amazingly funny; but now, just a bitter, angry old Leftist.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mikeyancey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:57:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Feds and the Episcopalians - Compare &amp;#038; Contrast</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=759#comment-9955367</link><description>This is where my money is going on:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/05/26/tenth-amendment-movement-aims-power-states/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/05/26/tent...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;("Tenth Amendment Movement Aims to Give Power Back to the States")&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also wonder, providing the 2010 census isn't 'gamed', what will happen after re-apportionment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no area of life that is not touched by the hoary hand of the Congress:&lt;br&gt;(soon) the type of light bulb you may purchase (no 100 watt incandescent and later lower wattages)&lt;br&gt;The type of toilet you may flush&lt;br&gt;Cars are regulated in their entirety&lt;br&gt;Now they're talking of what types of foods may be preferentially taxed or prohibited.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's not enough - it's too much.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mikeyancey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 11:46:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cats &amp;#038; Dogs &amp;#038; Men &amp;#038; Women.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=620#comment-9857326</link><description>Yes its true. Dogs are more special than cats. I don't hate cats but i love dogs more than cats. The size and characteristics of the dogs makes them more attractive. It is loyal to their owners than anyother living being in this world. Well they are good company for old ones in U.S..&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.fancyfelinesclevercanines.com/scratching-posts.aspx" rel="follow" rel="nofollow"&gt;scratching post&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ralph5</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 12:02:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green is the new Red.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=740#comment-9524747</link><description>You right on with that observation captain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">littleriver</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:22:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green is the new Red.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=740#comment-9524418</link><description>Don't forget...he also invented the Internet. According to him. Someday, I hope that a "gore" will make it into the dictionary, defined as "wildly exaggerated statement without any basis in fact." Right next to a "biden" - a crazy uncle no one pays the least bit of attention to, and a "pelosi" which would mean "someone who can't tell the difference in a lie and the truth, especially when it comes from their own mouths."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captaindigital</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:14:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Date Night.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=749#comment-9500002</link><description>"Werewolf?"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"THERE, Wolf..... There, Castle"....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;------- and, my ever-favorite....&lt;br&gt;Jim: Look at my hand.&lt;br&gt;[raises hand and holds it level]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bart: Steady as a rock.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jim: [raises his other hand, which is violently trembling] &lt;br&gt;Yeah, but I shoot with this one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mikeyancey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 13:32:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green is the new Red.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=740#comment-9290154</link><description>And remember: they use the term 'Green' in order to give a positive association with leftist causes and they do NOT use the word 'Conservation' in order to prevent a positive association with Conservatism. Words mean things. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note that if the words they've used 'turn people off'... they change the words, not the movement. The words described double-plus-unfact, and the people didn't buy it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's so nice when they avoid talking about how they wish to control every facet of our lives.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mikeyancey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:25:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Green is the new Red.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=740#comment-9239060</link><description>Why we should all fear Al Gore (Reason #31): Anyone who can get away with lying about the weather can get away with lying about anything.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">littleriver</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 06:26:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Swing Voter.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=731#comment-8824036</link><description>I prefer "Benedict Arlen Spectre...the Dark Lord of the Sith." Notice the family resemblance?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captaindigital</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:58:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Swing Voter.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=731#comment-8823666</link><description>Is that Senator Specter or Senator Sphincter? Hard to tell...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mikeyancey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:47:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Decline and Fall of the American Family.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=638#comment-8001164</link><description>When I watch Jeremy Kyle show or Dr Phil show, I see people in trouble because they lack family leader(s) in their lives. The media does not support honoring elderly ... and it is for good reasons ... it is easier to fool younger generation ...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">squinter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:50:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m working on something cool&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.captaindigital.net/?p=706#comment-7618612</link><description></description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">citizenw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:39:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m working on something cool&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.captaindigital.net/?p=706#comment-7618597</link><description>Except that, if you were REALLY familiar with the issue, you.d know that Virginia's portion of DC was returned at their request in the mid 1840's.  It is what is now known as Arlington, Alexandria, etc., Va.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is now known as DC was once part of Maryland, which doesn't WANT it back.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">citizenw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:38:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shaken. Not Stirred.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=633#comment-6654135</link><description>Yep. My dad used to tell me, no matter how noble the idea, it had to walk in on two clean feet. Geitner may be "the smartest kid in the room," (I have my doubts...BIG doubts), but he has zero credibility - not just because of his tax problems, but because he was the architect of TARP I - an unmitigated disaster. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The real problem here is when the government started gaming the system to achieve political goals (i.e.: get more people to buy houses...that they couldn't afford), eventually, the system breaks down. To see the guys that screwed it up (Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, TIm Geitner, etc.) all pointing the fingers elsewhere and claiming only THEY can fix the system, is reminiscent of O.J. hitting the golf links to find his wife's murderer. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Somebody buy these guys some mirrors (so they can see the source of the problem) - and maybe dose them with sodium pentathol before their next news conference.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captaindigital</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:46:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shaken. Not Stirred.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=633#comment-6651930</link><description>Just found this site while googling Tim Geitner. Could not agree more with your statements. The article below is what got me fired up. If he really thinks our anger is  directed only at the bank CEO's, he is a total idiot. Hey, maybe the bank CEO's just don't understand finance. There's plenty of blame to go around. Problem is nobody will stand up and admit they were wrong about any of this mess.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Geithner: Bankers to Blame for Loss of Confidence &lt;br&gt;Topics:Banking | Economy (U.S.) | Economy (Global) | Timothy Geithner | White House | Congress | Politics &amp; Government&lt;br&gt;Sectors:BanksBy: Reuters | 25 Feb 2009 | 05:41 PM ET Text Size U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on Wednesday scolded bankers for creating a damaging loss of confidence, but said nationalizing banks was the wrong strategy for the United States. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RELATED LINKS&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Current DateTime: 01:23:45 26 Feb 2009&lt;br&gt;LinksList Documentid: 29394471&lt;br&gt;Why More Banks Aren't Allowed to Fail&lt;br&gt;The Looming Credit Card Crisis&lt;br&gt;Why Nationalizing Banks Is Market Friendly&lt;br&gt;Bank Stress Tests Completed by End of April&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In an interview with Public Broadcasting Service's "Newshour" program, Geithner said he was "deeply offended by the quality of judgments we've seen in the leadership of our nation's financial institutions." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"They've created a deep hole of public distrust and anger which is enormously damaging, and they have a huge obligation to try to restore that basic trust and confidence. And we're going to make sure they do it by making sure that our assistance comes with conditions," he said.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gumby_28</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:09:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dr. StrangeGun.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=526#comment-6535409</link><description>I saw that movie and and the gun related special effects were terrible.  I especially enjoyed the part where the guy shoots a bullet that intercepts and redirects a bullet meant for her.  I'd enjoy movies like that so much more if someone would at least have to do a mag change every once in while.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gunholsters</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:54:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Flying.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=626#comment-6144480</link><description>Heh - gimme an email and I'll meet you for dinner when you get back to The Big "D".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Porkulus passed. &lt;br&gt;I'm currently reading "Anathem" by Neal Stephenson, but I think next it'll either be a re-read of either "Atlas Shrugged" by Rand or  "Das Kapital", by Marx (and certainly not Groucho, either, *wags eyebrows*). I'm not sure which would be more comforting or of practical use right now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mikeyancey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:17:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does &amp;#8220;American-Made&amp;#8221; mean?</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=519#comment-6109152</link><description>I completely agree with you on this, this post is quite unique and fresh, I enjoyed reading it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Radardetectors</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 03:27:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sauce for the Goose.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=605#comment-5532350</link><description>Interesting thought there. I guess maybe because he is still new in office and after a few weeks or so, or with major setbacks, the opposition will be at the top of their voice and start questioning.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">janettetoral</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:48:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: At the Movies&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=493#comment-5364607</link><description>Hello, for a long time I read your blog, thanks for that that write interesting and &lt;br&gt;useful posts.I consider that blogers it is possible to name many journalists. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good luck</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sat</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:10:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Homeland (In)security.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=587#comment-4987789</link><description>A very provocative idea. I remember that a few years back there were moves by some groups (Discovery Crusade) for  a signature campaign trying to put the Philippines back into U.S. rule (52nd state). The leader of that movement though disappeared and was found out later on to have died and buried without his family's first hand knowledge.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">janettetoral</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:41:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Tale of Two Satires.</title><link>http://captaindigital.net/?p=581#comment-4882136</link><description>The "Burn Before Watching" got me. LOL! I haven't seen War Inc. but will check it out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">janettetoral</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 14:50:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>